|Sr. Joan Chittister: An American Catholic in Rome|
Posted April 13, 2005 at 2:05 p.m. CDT
Win a couple, lose a couple
By Joan Chittister, OSB
Fathers have favorite sayings that grate on the nerves of anyone under 40 like welted thistles, harmless looking but hard to shake. Most of them, eventually, slip into disuse. After the age of 40, though, what little remains of them in memory has a way of getting collected into a new category called "wisdom."
I am operating off one of my father's sayings right now, in fact, the final assessment of which has yet to be determined.
"Win a couple, lose a couple," he would sigh every time the road of life took another unexpected turn. Here, or at least now, I have decided this could be an insight that deserves fresh consideration.
On the other hand, though you lose a sense of control in a climate like this, you can also gain a sense of calm. Life becomes something to be lived rather than something to be managed.
So, with the world press waiting with pencils poised, the announcement that the cardinals will not be giving public interviews in the period between the papal funeral and the conclave was not unusual. It was, however, a blow to the whole notion of public dialogue and information.
There are some clear benefits to the move away from public discussion of church issues at the present time.
In the first place, the electors gain personal privacy during what should be a time of serious reflection.
In the second place, they avoid the kind of public scrutiny of prominent cardinals that worldwide coverage automatically brings.
Most of all, perhaps, they are defended against the likelihood of any cardinal's saying some ecclesiastically indefensible thing.
But there are serious losses to the arrangement, as well.
The fact that the public can no longer count on open interviews with cardinals from around the world to help them understand how the conclave may define the serious issues facing the church at a time like this is, unarguably, a major loss. Reflection groups, academic seminars, formation programs, parish study groups, religious everywhere are denied the opportunity to consider these same ideas at a moment when a universal church is living in a segmented world and a segmented world is trying to be a universal church.
The inability to mull over the various theological leanings of those leaders of the church who will select the next pope is the loss of a major teaching moment. The vision of church that will color the election will affect the whole church and needs to be shared in order to be understood.
The lack of interlocutors who can ask the kind of questions that come from the ground up in the church is a troublesome factor. Questions alert people to the major streams of thought flowing through the entire church at a time like this. Otherwise, the cardinals themselves may be left blind to the concerns around them and unconscious of church's broader needs.
Oh, some reporters, I'm sure, who have personal ties to various cardinals will manage to run into one or two of them on the street and wrest an idea from them -- on the grounds, of course, that its "off the record."
This morning's New York Times carries an article by Robert F. Worth, In Jeans or veils, Iraqi women are split on new political power, detailing the passionate involvement of Iraqi women in the present government processes there. Reading that story leads observers watching this church election to wonder: Without any hope for someone to speak their concerns publicly, how will the rest of the Catholic church -- women, for instance -- be able to participate?
Don't bother to answer: We know.
So is "Win a couple, lose a couple" the ultimate philosophical attitude at a time like this? Only, I think, if what is to be gained overrides what is lost. Now there's the real question.
© 2005 The National Catholic Reporter Publishing Company, 115
E. Armour Blvd., Kansas City, MO 64111
TEL: 1-816-531-0538 FAX: 1-816-968-2280